Measuring Inconsistency in Argument Graphs
نویسنده
چکیده
There have been a number of developments in measuring inconsistency in logic-based representations of knowledge. In constrast, the development of inconsistency measures for computational models of argument has been limited. To address this shortcoming, this paper provides a general framework for measuring inconsistency in abstract argumentation, together with some proposals for specific measures, and a consideration of measuring inconsistency in logic-based instantiations of argument graphs, including a review of some existing proposals and a consideration of how existing logic-based measures of inconsistency can be applied.
منابع مشابه
Kinds of Inconsistency∗†
Typically paraconsistency is motivated by one of two types of arguments: either an ontological argument is given whereby it is claimed that inconsistent objects or events of some kind demand a logic able to reason about such items, or an epistemological argument is provided that denies that language or the world is infected with inconsistency but claims instead that the problem is all in a reas...
متن کاملInconsistency tolerance in weighted argument systems
We introduce and investigate a natural extension of Dung’s wellknown model of argument systems in which attacks are associated with a weight, indicating the relative strength of the attack. A key concept in our framework is the notion of an inconsistency budget, which characterises how much inconsistency we are prepared to tolerate: given an inconsistency budget β, we would be prepared to disre...
متن کاملOn Conceptual Graphs and Explanation of Query Answering under Inconsistency
Conceptual Graphs are a powerful visual knowledge representation language. In this paper we are interested in the use of Conceptual Graphs in the setting of Ontology Based Data Access, and, more specifically, in reasoning in the presence of inconsistency. We present different explanation heuristics of query answering under inconsistency and show how they can be implemented under the Conceptual ...
متن کاملMeasuring Inconsistency in Requirements Specifications
In the field of requirements engineering, measuring inconsistency is crucial to effective inconsistency management. A practical measure must consider both the degree and significance of inconsistency in specification. The main contribution of this paper is providing an approach for measuring inconsistent specification in terms of the prioritybased scoring vector, which integrates the measure of...
متن کاملMeasuring Inconsistency for Description Logics Based on Paraconsistent Semantics
In this paper, we present an approach for measuring inconsistency in a knowledge base. We first define the degree of inconsistency using a four-valued semantics for the description logicALC. Then an ordering over knowledge bases is given by considering their inconsistency degrees. Our measure of inconsistency can provide important information for inconsistency handling.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1708.02851 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017